Date: 2006-07-13 01:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com
What happened to the 19th century?

Date: 2006-07-13 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com
There wasn't much global warming until the Industrial Revolution, so the stuff that was representative of 1750 was representative until 1870 or so.

Date: 2006-07-13 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
More to the point, how is the 2006 model to be attached? Suckers? And can this trend be extrapolated more than a few years into the future without going into negative values? Inquiring minds want to know!

Date: 2006-07-13 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] powershutdown.livejournal.com
That's quite glorious.

Date: 2006-07-13 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fwuffydragon.livejournal.com
What would be even more amusing, and show a completely different trend, would be to put these in order of average dress size through the ages ...!

Might be worrying though!

Date: 2006-07-13 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sci.livejournal.com
I'm more interested to know how you're supposed to get it back out of your "negative values" once it's gotten itself in there. O_

Date: 2006-07-13 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
ITYM "Don't get your knickers in a twist." :o)

Profile

The Wild Ewt of the Plains of Canada

September 2013

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 30     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 11:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios