Date: 2006-07-13 01:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pseudomonas.livejournal.com
What happened to the 19th century?

Date: 2006-07-13 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com
There wasn't much global warming until the Industrial Revolution, so the stuff that was representative of 1750 was representative until 1870 or so.

Date: 2006-07-13 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
More to the point, how is the 2006 model to be attached? Suckers? And can this trend be extrapolated more than a few years into the future without going into negative values? Inquiring minds want to know!

Date: 2006-07-13 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sci.livejournal.com
I'm more interested to know how you're supposed to get it back out of your "negative values" once it's gotten itself in there. O_

Date: 2006-07-13 03:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lethargic-man.livejournal.com
ITYM "Don't get your knickers in a twist." :o)

Date: 2006-07-13 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] powershutdown.livejournal.com
That's quite glorious.

Date: 2006-07-13 02:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fwuffydragon.livejournal.com
What would be even more amusing, and show a completely different trend, would be to put these in order of average dress size through the ages ...!

Might be worrying though!

Profile

The Wild Ewt of the Plains of Canada

September 2013

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 30     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 07:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios