Ticked off the list
Jun. 7th, 2007 05:02 pmWell, whatever it is, it isn't Lyme - probably just irritation from a spider bite or similar. Lyme wouldn't have a blister and would be much redder and bigger. I'm to keep it clean (duh) and monitor for any changes and go back if I feel really sick or anything.
Ho-hum. That was a waste of an afternoon, in one sense, but a relief in another. Yay for not having to take yuckky antibiotics. Yay also for micropore tape.
Ho-hum. That was a waste of an afternoon, in one sense, but a relief in another. Yay for not having to take yuckky antibiotics. Yay also for micropore tape.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 04:57 pm (UTC)Hmm. Nothing wrong with a bit of paranoia I suppose though, if you really think it might be dangerous. Umm... and this comment is supposed to said in a friendly tone of voice, although I'm a little bit on edge atm. Don't want to sound like I'm trying to tell you off ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 07:53 pm (UTC)I went, I said, "I have this rash, I didn't have it yesterday, I've been out in long grass a lot and want to confirm it isn't anything nasty, especially because it has this little ring around it and little rings around things are usually bad news as I understand it, any ideas?"
I know the problem of people going "I think it's X" when it isn't anything like it; I also know that I lack the training to differentiate between EM rash and ordinary run-of-the-mill irritation, when that irritation doesn't seem to be normal for me. I went to the walk-in centre not because I was convinced it was Lyme, but because it could have been - the rash is pretty variable - and I knew I couldn't tell, especially as with my other heatlh problems I might not notice some of the other symptoms, and as someone who traipses around foraging a lot I'm probably at slightly higher risk than most (and I was particularly stupid about a week ago and walked in some very long grass in a skirt - would never do that in tick season in Canada but just forgot here).
Basically, if I don't know about identifying something I take it to someone with more training; I wouldn't expect someone to identify mugwort successfully after seeing it in some of the pictures online. These things take practice.
I apologised for taking up their time (about 120 seconds in all) and the nurse said that I absolutely did the right thing by coming in if I don't normally have that reaction to random bug bites (I don't, or haven't previously). They weren't terribly busy. I may disagree with them (or at least be unconvinced) about the prevalence of Lyme disease in this country but I'm not going to insist that I can identify a skin rash and they cannot when I know I do not have the expertise; whatever else happens, that particular rash is not likely to be due to Lyme disease.
I did have some trouble with my GP for a while where she did not take my physical symptoms seriously; this is a completely different problem, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 10:29 pm (UTC)I think the point of that is that yes, while it's annoying to have someone who doesn't know anything tell you your job, it's also annoying to have uppity professionals assume you can't possibly know anything.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 01:08 pm (UTC)The problem is that (presumably) the vast majority of the people who go and say "I have tonsillitis" really do just have a sore throat though. If they didn't, your doctor might well have taken you more seriously... at least in the end he did agree though :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-08 01:17 pm (UTC)You do have to wonder about the stats, I suppose. I wonder if Lyme's is common in certain areas and she really meant that "I've only heard of one case in ages". maybe I should read the other thread ;)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-07 10:01 pm (UTC)