What do you consider yourself an expert at? Why?
Studies show that most world-class experts in any field have spent at least 10000 hours working on the related skills. No, I don't have a citation to hand... What have you spent 10000 hours or more learning or practising? That's 3 hours a day for 10 years.
How much overlap is there between these categories?
Do you consider yourself a specialist or a generalist? Why?
Is expertise absolute or relative?
Studies show that most world-class experts in any field have spent at least 10000 hours working on the related skills. No, I don't have a citation to hand... What have you spent 10000 hours or more learning or practising? That's 3 hours a day for 10 years.
How much overlap is there between these categories?
Do you consider yourself a specialist or a generalist? Why?
Is expertise absolute or relative?
no subject
Date: 2008-04-05 05:28 pm (UTC)I suppose I have spent 10000 hours on things related to math and computer science. I am by *no* means an expert on that, though - there are always many people fairly close by who know more about it and/or are better at it.
I have no clue whether I am a specialist or a generalist. A bit of both, probably.
If expertise is relative, then I do classify as an expert in some situations. Defining 'expert' as 'the person available who knows most/can do it best' with regard to a topic (which would make it relative) makes more sense to me than defining it in terms of a number of hours spent, since the time spent may be much more effective for one person than for another, and perhaps in some fields there isn't enough to know to spend that many hours on before you know 'everything' (so even the most knowledgeable person in the world might not qualify as an expert). So, I am leaning towards relative.